Aug 262009
 

Nokia’s non-touchscreen devices have used QVGA screens for the last few years: while this is not ideal for users, it relieves developers of a large burden (multiple screen resolutions). It furthermore gives Nokia more bargaining power – but how does the E75 stack up?

Our first test partner is Palm’s Treo 680.
nokia e75 screen 0w Nokia E75 review   screen nokia e75 screen 0a Nokia E75 review   screen nokia e75 screen 0b Nokia E75 review   screen nokia e75 screen 0c Nokia E75 review   screen nokia e75 screen 0d Nokia E75 review   screen

Next up is HP’s iPaq rx4240. The E75 manages to beat it by a slight margin in some tests:
nokia e75 screen 1a Nokia E75 review   screen nokia e75 screen 1b Nokia E75 review   screen nokia e75 screen 1c Nokia E75 review   screen nokia e75 screen 1d Nokia E75 review   screen nokia e75 screen 1e Nokia E75 review   screen

Finally, a few shots next to the Nokia N96. Its results are completely different due to the different color temperature of its screen:
nokia e75 screen 2a Nokia E75 review   screen nokia e75 screen 2b Nokia E75 review   screen nokia e75 screen 2c Nokia E75 review   screen nokia e75 screen 2d Nokia E75 review   screen nokia e75 screen 2e Nokia E75 review   screen

In the end, the Nokia E75 has a surprisingly good screen which remains readable outdoors. Nothing to bicker about here – can the software stack up though?


Related posts:

  1. Nokia C5 review – screen
  2. Nokia E63 review – screen
  3. Nokia C6 review – screen
  4. The Nokia N81 8GB review – screen
  5. Nokia E72 review – screen

 Leave a Reply

(required)

(required)

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe without commenting